🔍

CyberCX vs Data#3: Which MSP is Better? | The MSP Playbook

Article 2026-06-12

CyberCX vs Data#3

A detailed comparison of two major Australian Managed Service Providers.

Feature CyberCX Data#3
Overall Score3.23.8
TypeSecurity / Private EquityPublicly Listed Giant
Employees500-10001500-2000
Founded20191977
HeadquartersMelbourne, VICBrisbane, QLD
RevenuePrivate$884.8M
Salary Range$80,000 - $165,000$80,000 - $160,000
SpecialtiesCybersecurity, Penetration Testing, SOC, Incident ResponseMicrosoft Solutions, Cloud, Managed Services, Software Licensing
CertificationsISO 27001, CREST, SOC 2, PCI DSSMicrosoft Partner, AWS Partner, Cisco Partner, VMware Partner
Green FlagsCybersecurity focus is high-demand
Good technology exposure
Growing rapidly
ASX-listed (ASX: DDD) — financial transparency
Strong Australian focus — no offshoring agenda
Good work-life balance
Profitable and growing
Red FlagsRapid acquisition strategy creates integration challenges
Below-market salaries at senior levels
Cultural inconsistency across acquired companies
Below-market salaries at senior levels
Government contract dependency
Limited international exposure
Acquisition-driven growth creates integration challenges
Worker ProsCybersecurity focus
Good tech exposure
Growing
ASX-listed transparency — you know the numbers
Australian-focused — your job isn't being offshored
Profitable and growing — stability
Good work-life balance in most teams
Worker ConsAcquisition chaos
Below-market pay
Cultural inconsistency
Below-market salaries at senior levels
Government contract dependency creates cyclicality
Limited international exposure
Acquisition integration can be bumpy

Which MSP Should You Choose?

Both Security / Private Equity and Publicly Listed Giant have strengths and weaknesses. Your choice depends on your priorities — whether that's career growth, salary, work-life balance, or technical exposure.

Use the side-by-side comparison tool for a deeper look, or check out individual profiles for detailed employee reviews.